The Zeno argumentation framework
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Risk Agoras: Dialectical Argumentation for Scientific Reasoning
UAI '00 Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence
Arguing about cases as practical reasoning
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Argumentation in artificial intelligence
Artificial Intelligence
Arguing over Actions That Involve Multiple Criteria: A Critical Review
ECSQARU '07 Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
Artificial Intelligence
Asking the Right Question: Forcing Commitment in Examination Dialogues
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
Political Engagement Through Tools for Argumentation
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
Argument Schemes and Critical Questions for Decision Aiding Process
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper we discuss the integration of two systems that are based on a specific theory of argumentation: the first, an existing web-based discussion forum; the second, a method to enable autonomous software agents to perform practical reasoning based upon their subscription to social values. Weshow how the output from the first of these systems can be used as input to the second and how the information gathered can be reasoned about through computer support. The purpose of the approach is to demonstrate how current theories of argumentation can be used to assist with the analysis of public attitude in a particular debate, with the specific example domain used being that of eDemocracy. We also provide some discussion and comparison of these current tools with similar, earlier systems.