Two party immediate response disputes: properties and efficiency
Artificial Intelligence
Audiences in argumentation frameworks
Artificial Intelligence
Value Based Argumentation in Hierarchical Argumentation Frameworks
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
Inconsistency tolerance in weighted argument systems
Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2
Case law in extended argumentation frameworks
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
ECSQARU '09 Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Social Argument Justification: Some Mechanisms and Conditions for Their Coincidence
ECSQARU '09 Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Labellings and games for extended argumentation frameworks
IJCAI'09 Proceedings of the 21st international jont conference on Artifical intelligence
Support in Abstract Argumentation
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
AFRA: Argumentation framework with recursive attacks
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
Weighted argument systems: Basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
Artificial Intelligence
Attack semantics for abstract argumentation
IJCAI'11 Proceedings of the Twenty-Second international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume One
A logic of argumentation for specification and verification of abstract argumentation frameworks
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
A recent extension to Dung's argumentation framework allows for arguments to express preferences between other arguments. Value based argumentation can be formalised in this extended framework, enabling meta-level argumentation about the values that arguments promote, and the orderings on these values. In this paper, we show how extended frameworks integrating meta-level reasoning about values can be rewritten as Dung frameworks, and show a soundness and completeness result with respect to the rewrites. We then describe how value orderings can emerge, or be 'formed', as a result of dialogue games based on the rewritten frameworks, and illustrate the advantages of this approach over existing dialogue games for value based argumentation frameworks.