Performance and Computational Complexity Comparison of Block-Based Fingerprint Enhancement

Authors:
Suksan Jirachaweng;Teesid Leelasawassuk;Vutipong Areekul
Affiliations:
Kasetsart Signal & Image Processing Laboratory (KSIP Lab), Department of Electrical Engineering, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand 10900;Kasetsart Signal & Image Processing Laboratory (KSIP Lab), Department of Electrical Engineering, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand 10900;Kasetsart Signal & Image Processing Laboratory (KSIP Lab), Department of Electrical Engineering, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand 10900
Venue:
ICB '09 Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Advances in Biometrics
Year:
2009

Citing 5
Cited 1

Fingerprint Image Enhancement: Algorithm and Performance Evaluation

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition

Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition
The New Focal Point Localization Algorithm for Fingerprint Registration

ICPR '06 Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition - Volume 04
Fingerprint enhancement using STFT analysis

Pattern Recognition
Fingerprint enhancement based on discrete cosine transform

ICB'07 Proceedings of the 2007 international conference on Advances in Biometrics

Adaptive boosted spectral filtering for progressive fingerprint enhancement

Pattern Recognition

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Performance and computational complexity comparisons of various block-based fingerprint enhancement schemes are tested and reported in this literature. Enhancement performance is evaluated by comparing equal error rates, which obtained by a proposed fingerprint matching algorithm using local and global features. Various enhancement methods are tested; i.e. three types of spatial Gabor filtering, short-time Fourier transform filtering, and discrete cosine transform filtering. These enhancement schemes also tested with various databases such as FVC2000, FVC2002, and FVC2004. Finally, computational complexity of enhancement implementation is analyzed and concluded.