LEARNABLE EVOLUTION MODEL: Evolutionary Processes Guided by Machine Learning
Machine Learning - Special issue on multistrategy learning
Estimation of Distribution Algorithms: A New Tool for Evolutionary Computation
Estimation of Distribution Algorithms: A New Tool for Evolutionary Computation
A Survey of Optimization by Building and Using Probabilistic Models
Computational Optimization and Applications
The Proportional Genetic Algorithm: Gene Expression in a Genetic Algorithm
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
Modeling Building-Block Interdependency
PPSN V Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature
Statistics for Business and Economics (with Student CD-ROM, iPod Key Term, and InfoTrac )
Statistics for Business and Economics (with Student CD-ROM, iPod Key Term, and InfoTrac )
Using over-sampling in a Bayesian classifier EDA to solve deceptive and hierarchical problems
CEC'09 Proceedings of the Eleventh conference on Congress on Evolutionary Computation
Representation development from pareto-coevolution
GECCO'03 Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation: PartI
Wise breeding GA via machine learning techniques for function optimization
GECCO'03 Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation: PartI
Building classifiers using Bayesian networks
AAAI'96 Proceedings of the thirteenth national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Several algorithms within the field of Evolutionary Computation have been proposed that effectively turn optimisation problems into supervised learning tasks. Typically such hybrid algorithms partition their populations into three subsets, high performing, low performing and mediocre, where the subset containing mediocre candidates is discarded from the phase of model construction. In this paper we will empirically compare this traditional partitioning scheme against two alternative schemes on a range of difficult problems from the literature. The experiments will show that at small population sizes, using the whole population is often a better approach than the traditional partitioning scheme, but partitioning around the midpoint and ignoring candidates at the extremes, is often even better.