A Comparison of NoTA and GENESYS

Authors:
Bernhard Huber;Roman Obermaisser
Affiliations:
Institute of Computer Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Wien, Austria 1040;Institute of Computer Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Wien, Austria 1040
Venue:
SAMOS '09 Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Embedded Computer Systems: Architectures, Modeling, and Simulation
Year:
2009

Citing 3
Cited 0

Compositional Design of RT Systems: A Conceptual Basis for Specification of Linking Interfaces

ISORC '03 Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Symposium on Object-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing
New Directions in Mobile Device Architectures

DSD '06 Proceedings of the 9th EUROMICRO Conference on Digital System Design
Fundamental Design Principles for Embedded Systems: The Architectural Style of the Cross-Domain Architecture GENESYS

ISORC '09 Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Object/Component/Service-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In the field of embedded systems, the trend of converging application systems (e.g., multimedia systems entering the automotive domain) is observable. Undertakings to tackle the challenges introduced by this digital convergence have been started by the European Union in the last years. GENESYS is such a European project that aims at developing a cross-domain architecture for embedded systems, which facilitates this digital convergence. This paper compares the GENESYS architecture with the Network on Terminal Architecture (NoTA), which is primarily targeted to the consumer applications domain, and elaborates on their major commonalities and differences such as service-orientation, component-based design, or the need for rigorous interface specifications.