GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews
CSCW '94 Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Social information filtering: algorithms for automating “word of mouth”
CHI '95 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms
Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web
A collaborative filtering algorithm and evaluation metric that accurately model the user experience
Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification
WWW '05 Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web
Improving the effectiveness of collaborative recommendation with ontology-based user profiles
Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Information Heterogeneity and Fusion in Recommender Systems
Power to the people: exploring neighbourhood formations in social recommender system
Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems
A simple but effective method to incorporate trusted neighbors in recommender systems
UMAP'12 Proceedings of the 20th international conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization
User-centric evaluation of a K-furthest neighbor collaborative filtering recommender algorithm
Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Exploiting non-content preference attributes through hybrid recommendation method
Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Recommender systems
ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB)
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Collaborative filtering (CF) techniques have proved to be a powerful and popular component of modern recommender systems. Common approaches such as user-based and item-based methods generate predictions from the past ratings of users by combining two separate ratings components: a base estimate , generally based on the average rating of the target user or item, and a neighbourhood estimate , generally based on the ratings of similar users or items. The common assumption is that the neighbourhood estimate gives CF techniques a considerable edge over simpler average-rating techniques. In this paper we examine this assumption more carefully and demonstrate that the influence of neighbours can be surprisingly minor in CF algorithms, and we show how this has been disguised by traditional approaches to evaluation, which, we argue, have limited progress in the field.