Estimating Uncertainty in Brain Region Delineations

  • Authors:

  • Karl R. Beutner, Iii;Gautam Prasad;Evan Fletcher;Charles Decarli;Owen T. Carmichael

  • Affiliations:

  • University of California at Davis, Davis, USA CA 95616;University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA CA 90095;University of California at Davis, Davis, USA CA 95616;University of California at Davis, Davis, USA CA 95616;University of California at Davis, Davis, USA CA 95616

  • Venue:
  • IPMI '09 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging
  • Year:
  • 2009

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper presents a method for estimating uncertainty in MRI-based brain region delineations provided by fully-automated segmentation methods. In large data sets, the uncertainty estimates could be used to detect fully-automated method failures, identify low-quality imaging data, or endow downstream statistical analyses with per-subject uncertainty in derived morphometric measures. Region segmentation is formulated in a statistical inference framework; the probability that a given region-delineating surface accounts for observed image data is quantified by a distribution that takes into account a prior model of plausible region shape and a model of how the region appears in images. Region segmentation consists of finding the maximum a posteriori (MAP) parameters of the delineating surface under this distribution, and segmentation uncertainty is quantified in terms of how sharply peaked the distribution is in the vicinity of the maximum. Uncertainty measures are estimated through Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling of the distribution in the vicinity of the MAP estimate. Experiments on real and synthetic data show that the uncertainty measures automatically detect when the delineating surface of the entire brain is unclear due to poor image quality or artifact; the experiments cover multiple appearance models to demonstrate the generality of the method. The approach is also general enough to accommodate a wide range of shape models and brain regions.