Objective vs. Subjective Evaluation of Speakers with and without Complete Dentures

  • Authors:
  • Tino Haderlein;Tobias Bocklet;Andreas Maier;Elmar Nöth;Christian Knipfer;Florian Stelzle

  • Affiliations:
  • Lehrstuhl für Mustererkennung (Informatik 5), Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany 91058 and Abteilung für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie, Universität Erlan ...;Lehrstuhl für Mustererkennung (Informatik 5), Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany 91058;Lehrstuhl für Mustererkennung (Informatik 5), Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany 91058 and Abteilung für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie, Universität Erlan ...;Lehrstuhl für Mustererkennung (Informatik 5), Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany 91058;Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgische Klinik, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany 91054;Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgische Klinik, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany 91054

  • Venue:
  • TSD '09 Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Text, Speech and Dialogue
  • Year:
  • 2009

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

For dento-oral rehabilitation of edentulous (toothless) patients, speech intelligibility is an important criterion. 28 persons read a standardized text once with and once without wearing complete dentures. Six experienced raters evaluated the intelligibility subjectively on a 5-point scale and the voice on the 4-point Roughness-Breathiness-Hoarseness (RBH) scales. Objective evaluation was performed by Support Vector Regression (SVR) on the word accuracy (WA) and word recognition rate (WR) of a speech recognition system, and a set of 95 word based prosodic features. The word accuracy combined with selected prosodic features showed a correlation of up to r = 0.65 to the subjective ratings for patients with dentures and r = 0.72 for patients without dentures. For the RBH scales, however, the average correlation of the feature subsets to the subjective ratings for both types of recordings was r