An Analysis of Sum-Based Incommensurable Belief Base Merging

  • Authors:
  • Salem Benferhat;Sylvain Lagrue;Julien Rossit

  • Affiliations:
  • CRIL-CNRS UMR 8081, Université d'Artois, Faculté des Sciences Jean Perrin, Lens, France 62307;CRIL-CNRS UMR 8081, Université d'Artois, Faculté des Sciences Jean Perrin, Lens, France 62307;CRIL-CNRS UMR 8081, Université d'Artois, Faculté des Sciences Jean Perrin, Lens, France 62307

  • Venue:
  • SUM '09 Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management
  • Year:
  • 2009
  • Information fusion

    SUM'10 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Different methods have been proposed for merging multiple and potentially conflicting informations. Sum-based operators offer a natural method for merging commensurable prioritized belief bases. Their popularity is due to the fact that they satisfy the majority property and they adopt a non cautious attitude in deriving plausible conclusions. This paper analyses the sum-based merging operator when sources to merge are incommensurable, namely they do not share the same meaning of uncertainty scales. We first show that the obtained merging operator can be equivalently characterized either in terms of an infinite set of compatible scales, or by a well-known Pareto ordering on a set of models. We then study different families of compatible scales useful for merging process. This paper also provides a postulates-based analysis of our merging operators.