Assessing ease of reconfiguration of conventional and Holonic manufacturing systems: Approach and case study

  • Authors:
  • Wutthiphat Covanich;Duncan McFarlane

  • Affiliations:
  • Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Mill Lane, Cambridge CB2 1RX, UK;Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Mill Lane, Cambridge CB2 1RX, UK

  • Venue:
  • Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
  • Year:
  • 2009

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper focuses on comparing the ease of reconfiguration of Holonic and conventional manufacturing systems (HMS and CMS). By using the recently proposed guideline for assessing ease of reconfiguration [Covanich, W., McFarlane, D., Farid, A.M., 2008. Guidelines for Evaluating the Ease of Reconfiguration of Manufacturing Systems. Daejeon, South Korea. INDIN08], the paper evaluates the effort required to introduce a new machine into both conventional and Holonic manufacturing systems. Examining particularly the ease of reconfiguration, it is found that HMS with conventional hardware may have little advantage over CMS, while HMS with ideal hardware appears to have significant advantage over CMS.