How expert should an expert system be?

  • Authors:
  • Roger T. Hartley

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Computer Science, Kansas State University and Computer Science Department, Brunei University, U.K.

  • Venue:
  • IJCAI'81 Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2
  • Year:
  • 1981

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

A computer system which aids computer engineers in fault diagnosis is described. The system, called CRIB (Computer Retrieval Incidence Bank) is shown to fit into the class of pattern-directed inference systems. Emphasis is placed on the "before" and "after" phases of system generation and it is shown why, to be called an expert system, these phases are important. The forms of knowledge used in CRIB are shown to be adequate for diagnosis and yet possess little of the structural or functional knowledge of more advanced expert systems. Summaries are given of the three phases of implementation: elicitation, implementation of knowledge structures, validation and improvement. The idea of an expert system as a "model of competence" is mentioned and the transferrance of the system architecture to software diagnosis, using the same model, is described. There are short discussions of system performance and the nature of expert systems.