Exploiting irrelevance reasoning to guide problem solving

  • Authors:
  • Alon Y. Levy;Yehoshua Sagiv

  • Affiliations:
  • Dept. of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California;Dept. of Computer Science, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

  • Venue:
  • IJCAI'93 Proceedings of the 13th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence - Volume 1
  • Year:
  • 1993

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Identifying that parts of a knowledge base (KB) are irrelevant to a specific query is a powerful method of controlling search during problem solving. However, finding methods of such irrelevance reasoning and analyzing their utility are open problems. We present a framework based on a proof-theoretic analysis of irrelevance that enables us to address these problems. Within the framework, we focus on a class of strong-irrelevance claims and show that they have several desirable properties. For example, in the context of Horn-rule theories, we show that strong-irrelevance claims can be derived efficiently either by examining the KB or as logical consequences of other strong-irrelevance claims. An important aspect is that our algorithms reason about irrelevance using only a small part of the KB. Consequently, the reasoning is efficient and the derived irrelevance claims are independent of changes to other parts of the KB.