VIS '97 Proceedings of the 8th conference on Visualization '97
Semi-automatic generation of transfer functions for direct volume rendering
VVS '98 Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE symposium on Volume visualization
Fast detection of meaningful isosurfaces for volume data visualization
Proceedings of the conference on Visualization '01
Multidimensional Transfer Functions for Interactive Volume Rendering
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
The Transfer Function Bake-Off
IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications
Spatiograms versus Histograms for Region-Based Tracking
CVPR '05 Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) - Volume 2 - Volume 02
Visualization of Boundaries in Volumetric Data Sets Using LH Histograms
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
Size-based Transfer Functions: A New Volume Exploration Technique
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
Interactive Volume Exploration for Feature Detection and Quantification in Industrial CT Data
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
Spatialized transfer functions
EUROVIS'05 Proceedings of the Seventh Joint Eurographics / IEEE VGTC conference on Visualization
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Transfer function (TF) specification for 3D visualization can be improved by incorporating more than just intensity information. Gradient magnitude is an additional property that has been used predominantly for defining TFs based on 2D histograms. Recently, feature size has been introduced as an alternative. In this work we compare the usability of such 2D histograms for the visualization of 3D scalar data. By giving visualization examples for well-known volume data sets we conclude that employing feature size for TF specification is more intuitive than gradient magnitude based approaches.