Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)
Collaborative recommendation: A robustness analysis
ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT)
Fighting peer-to-peer SPAM and decoys with object reputation
Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Economics of peer-to-peer systems
Toward trustworthy recommender systems: An analysis of attack models and algorithm robustness
ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT)
The influence limiter: provably manipulation-resistant recommender systems
Proceedings of the 2007 ACM conference on Recommender systems
Robust collaborative filtering
Proceedings of the 2007 ACM conference on Recommender systems
The information cost of manipulation-resistance in recommender systems
Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems
Reporting incentives and biases in online review forums
ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB)
A Social-Feedback Enriched Interface for Software Download
Journal of Organizational and End User Computing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Recommender systems based on user feedback rank items by aggregating users' ratings in order to select those that are ranked highest. Ratings are usually aggregated using a weighted arithmetic mean. However, the mean is quite sensitive to outliers and biases, and thus may not be the most informative aggregate. We compare the accuracy and robustness of three different aggregators: the mean, median and mode. The results show that the median may often be a better choice than the mean, and can significantly improve recommendation accuracy and robustness in collaborative filtering systems.