Performance study of ad hoc routing protocols with gossip-based approach

Authors:
Ahyoung Lee;Ilkyeun Ra;HwaSung Kim
Affiliations:
University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado;University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado;Kwangwoon University, Seoul, Korea
Venue:
SpringSim '09 Proceedings of the 2009 Spring Simulation Multiconference
Year:
2009

Citing 7
Cited 1

Highly dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers

SIGCOMM '94 Proceedings of the conference on Communications architectures, protocols and applications
A distributed routing algorithm for mobile wireless networks

Wireless Networks
A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols

MobiCom '98 Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking
Randomized rumor spreading

FOCS '00 Proceedings of the 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing

WMCSA '99 Proceedings of the Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computer Systems and Applications
Lightweight probabilistic broadcast

ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS)
Analysis of Dynamic Source Routing and Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Protocols for Different Mobility Models

AMS '07 Proceedings of the First Asia International Conference on Modelling & Simulation

Adaptive-gossiping for an energy-aware routing protocol in wireless sensor networks

Proceedings of the 6th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

A variety of ad hoc routing protocols based on a simple flooding routing method have been developed under the constraints of the limited transmission range of wireless network interfaces and other limited mobility resources in MANETs. In this paper we discuss the performance of a gossip-based routing and flooding protocol based on ad hoc on-demand routing protocols in order to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each protocol and suggest appropriate MANET environments for each routing protocol. To accomplish our goals, we selected six performance metrics: packet delivery fraction, average end-to-end delay of data packets, routing overhead, normalized routing load, throughput, and average node energy used. We performed simulations of three ad hoc routing protocols: AODV+G, AODV, and DSR, using the ns-2 network simulation tool.