Planning reference choices for argumentative texts

  • Authors:
  • Xiaorong Huang

  • Affiliations:
  • Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany

  • Venue:
  • INLG '94 Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Natural Language Generation
  • Year:
  • 1994

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper deals with the reference choices involved in the generation of argumentative text. A piece of argumentative text such as the proof of a mathematical theorem conveys a sequence of derivations. For each step of derivation, the premises (previously conveyed intermediate results) and the inference method (such as the application of a particular theorem or definition) must be made clear. The appropriateness of these references crucially affects the quality of the text produced. Although not restricted to nominal phrases, our reference decisions are similar to those concerning nominal subsequent referring expressions: they depend on the availability of the object referred to within a context and are sensitive to its attentional hierarchy. In this paper, we show how the current context can be appropriately segmented into an attentional hierarchy by viewing text generation as a combination of planned and unplanned behavior, and how the discourse theory of Reichmann can be adapted to handle our special reference problem.