Wyner-Ziv Coding for Video: Applications to Compression and Error Resilience
DCC '03 Proceedings of the Conference on Data Compression
Enhancement of unequal error protection properties of LDPC codes
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
Wyner-Ziv coding of video: an error-resilient compression framework
IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
Distributed source coding using syndromes (DISCUS): design and construction
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Error-resilient image and video transmission over the Internet using unequal error protection
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
PRISM: A Video Coding Paradigm With Motion Estimation at the Decoder
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Overview of the H.264/AVC video coding standard
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
Distributed video coding: trends and perspectives
Journal on Image and Video Processing - Special issue on distributed video coding
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In distributed video coding the signal prediction is shifted at the decoder side, giving therefore most of the computational complexity burden at the receiver. Moreover, since no prediction loop exists before transmission, an intrinsic robustness to transmission errors has been claimed. This work evaluates and compares the error resilience performance of two distributed video coding architectures. In particular, we have considered a video codec based on the Stanford architecture (DISCOVER codec) and a video codec based on the PRISM architecture. Specifically, an accurate temporal and rate/distortion based evaluation of the effects of the transmission errors for both the considered DVC architectures has been performed and discussed. These approaches have been also compared with H.264/AVC, in both cases of no error protection, and simple FEC error protection. Our evaluations have highlighted in all cases a strong dependence of the behavior of the various codecs to the content of the considered video sequence. In particular, PRISM seems to be particularly well suited for low-motion sequences, whereas DISCOVER provides better performance in the other cases.