Explaining preferences with argument positions

Authors:
Sylvie Doutre;Trevor Bench-Capon;Paul E. Dunne
Affiliations:
Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom;Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom;Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Venue:
IJCAI'05 Proceedings of the 19th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence
Year:
2005

Citing 2
Cited 5

On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games

Artificial Intelligence
Two party immediate response disputes: properties and efficiency

Artificial Intelligence

Audiences in argumentation frameworks

Artificial Intelligence
Argumentation in artificial intelligence

Artificial Intelligence
Preferences and assumption-based argumentation for conflict-free normative agents

ArgMAS'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems
Determining preferences through argumentation

AI*IA'05 Proceedings of the 9th conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence
Argumentation for decision support

DEXA'06 Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

When deciding what to do agents must choose among alternative actions and different agents may make different choices according to what they wish to achieve in the light of their preferences and values. It cannot be assumed, however, that agents have a conscious understanding of their value preferences independent of the reasoning situations in which they engage. In this paper we consider an extension to a generic framework for reasoning about arguments justifying actions in terms of values in which the preferences amongst values emerge from the reasoning process.