Introduction to statistical pattern recognition (2nd ed.)
Introduction to statistical pattern recognition (2nd ed.)
The Random Subspace Method for Constructing Decision Forests
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Learning and Soft Computing: Support Vector Machines, Neural Networks, and Fuzzy Logic Models
Learning and Soft Computing: Support Vector Machines, Neural Networks, and Fuzzy Logic Models
Support vector machines with different norms: motivation, formulations and results
Pattern Recognition Letters
Comparison of Two Classification Methodologies on a Real-World Biomedical Problem
Proceedings of the Joint IAPR International Workshop on Structural, Syntactic, and Statistical Pattern Recognition
Feature Selection Via Mathematical Programming
INFORMS Journal on Computing
Signal Processing - Special issue: Genomic signal processing
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications
Support Vectors Selection by Linear Programming
IJCNN '00 Proceedings of the IEEE-INNS-ENNS International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN'00)-Volume 5 - Volume 5
Pattern Classification (2nd Edition)
Pattern Classification (2nd Edition)
Reducing the overconfidence of base classifiers when combining their decisions
MCS'03 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Multiple classifier systems
CVPR'03 Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE computer society conference on Computer vision and pattern recognition
Liknon Feature Selection for Microarrays
WILF '07 Proceedings of the 7th international workshop on Fuzzy Logic and Applications: Applications of Fuzzy Sets Theory
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Objective: Demonstrate that incorporating domain knowledge into feature selection methods helps identify interpretable features with predictive capability comparable to a state-of-the-art classifier. Methods: Two feature selection methods, one using a genetic algorithm (GA) the other a L"1-norm support vector machine (SVM), were investigated on three real-world biomedical magnetic resonance (MR) spectral datasets of increasing difficulty. Consensus sets of the feature sets obtained by the two methods were also assessed. Results and conclusions: Features identified independently by the two methods and by their consensus, determine class-discriminatory groups or individual features, whose predictive power compares favorably with that of a state-of-the-art classifier. Furthermore, the identified feature signatures form stable groupings at definite spectral positions, hence are readily interpretable. This is a useful and important practical result for generating hypothesis for the domain expert. t.