SIGCOMM '92 Conference proceedings on Communications architectures & protocols
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON)
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON)
Quality of service: delivering QoS on the Internet and in corporate networks
Quality of service: delivering QoS on the Internet and in corporate networks
Best-effort versus reservations: a simple comparative analysis
Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM '98 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication
Latency-rate servers: a general model for analysis of traffic scheduling algorithms
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON)
Differentiated Services for the Internet
Differentiated Services for the Internet
Computer Networks
QoS Support for Per-Flow Services: POS vs. IP-over-ATM
IEEE Internet Computing
Bandwidth allocation for multiple qualities of service using generalized processor sharing
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Application of network calculus to guaranteed service networks
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
A calculus for network delay. I. Network elements in isolation
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
A calculus for network delay. II. Network analysis
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
IEEE Communications Magazine
Fundamental design issues for the future Internet
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
A case for relative differentiated services and the proportional differentiation model
IEEE Network: The Magazine of Global Internetworking
Hi-index | 0.24 |
This paper deals with the impact of traffic handling mechanisms on capacity for different network architectures. Three traffic handling models are considered: per-flow, class-based and best-effort (BE). These models can be used to meet service guarantees, the major differences being in their complexity of implementations and in the quantity of network resources that must be provided. In this study, the performance is fixed and the required capacity determined for various combinations of traffic handling architectures for edge-core networks. This study provides a comparison of different QoS architectures. One key result of this work is that on the basis of capacity requirements, there is no significant difference between semi-aggregate traffic handling and per-flow traffic handling. However, best-effort handling requires significantly more capacity as compared to the other methods.