Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the kappa statistic
Computational Linguistics
CiteSeer: an automatic citation indexing system
Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Digital libraries
An annotation scheme for discourse-level argumentation in research articles
EACL '99 Proceedings of the ninth conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Creating a test collection for citation-based IR experiments
HLT-NAACL '06 Proceedings of the main conference on Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics
Automatic classification of citation function
EMNLP '06 Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Automatic classification of citation function
EMNLP '06 Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Panel session: discourse annotation
LAW '07 Proceedings of the Linguistic Annotation Workshop
Researcher affiliation extraction from homepages
NLPIR4DL '09 Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Text and Citation Analysis for Scholarly Digital Libraries
Proceedings of the 10th annual joint conference on Digital libraries
Annotating underquantification
LAW IV '10 Proceedings of the Fourth Linguistic Annotation Workshop
New trends for reading scientific documents
Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on Online books, complementary social media and crowdsourcing
Ontology paper: FaBiO and CiTO: Ontologies for describing bibliographic resources and citations
Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We study the interplay of the discourse structure of a scientific argument with formal citations. One subproblem of this is to classify academic citations in scientific articles according to their rhetorical function, e.g., as a rival approach, as a part of the solution, or as a flawed approach that justifies the current research. Here, we introduce our annotation scheme with 12 categories, and present an agreement study.