What is the right model for wireless channel interference?

  • Authors:
  • Aravind Iyer;Catherine Rosenberg;Aditya Karnik

  • Affiliations:
  • General Motors India Science Laboratory, Bangalore, India;Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada;General Motors India Science Laboratory, Bangalore, India

  • Venue:
  • IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
  • Year:
  • 2009

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.01

Visualization

Abstract

In wireless communications, the desired wireless signal is typically decoded by treating the sum of all the other on-going signal transmissions as noise. In the networking literature, this phenomenon is typically abstracted using a wireless channel interference model. The level of detail in the interference model, evidently determines the accuracy of the results based upon the model. Several works in the networking literature have made use of simplistic interference models, e.g., fixed ranges for communication and interference, the capture threshold model (used in the ns2 network simulator), the protocol model, and so on. At the same time, fairly complex interference models such as those based on the SINR (signal-to-interference-and-noise ratio) have also been proposed and used. We investigate the impact of the choice of the interference model, on the conclusions that can be drawn regarding the performance of wireless networks, by comparing different wireless interference models. We find that both in the case of random access networks, as well as in the case of scheduled networks (where node transmissions are scheduled to be completely conflict-free), different interference models can produce significantly different results. Therefore, a lot of caution should be exercised before accepting or interpreting results based on simplified interference models. Further, we feel that an SINR-based model is the minimum level of detail that should be employed to model wireless channel interference in a networking context.