An interactive evolutionary multi-objective optimization and decision making procedure

Authors:
Shamik Chaudhuri;Kalyanmoy Deb
Affiliations:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur1, Kanpur, 208016, India;Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur1, Kanpur, 208016, India and Department of Business Technology, Helsinki School of Economics, FIN-00101, Finland
Venue:
Applied Soft Computing
Year:
2010

Citing 12
Cited 8

Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms

Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Innovization: innovating design principles through optimization

Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: Recent Accomplishments and What Lies Ahead

Management Science
Some techniques to deal with many-objective problems

Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference: Late Breaking Papers
I-MODE: an interactive multi-objective optimization and decision-making using evolutionary methods

EMO'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization
Dynamic multi-objective optimization and decision-making using modified NSGA-II: a case study on hydro-thermal power scheduling

EMO'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization
I-EMO: an interactive evolutionary multi-objective optimization tool

PReMI'05 Proceedings of the First international conference on Pattern Recognition and Machine Intelligence
Searching for robust pareto-optimal solutions in multi-objective optimization

EMO'05 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II

IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Ergonomic Chair Design by Fusing Qualitative and Quantitative Criteria Using Interactive Genetic Algorithms

IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm toolbox for computer-aidedmultiobjective optimization

IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics
Multiobjective optimization and multiple constraint handling with evolutionary algorithms. II. Application example

IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans

Preference modeling and model management for interactive multi-objective evolutionary optimization

IPMU'10 Proceedings of the Computational intelligence for knowledge-based systems design, and 13th international conference on Information processing and management of uncertainty
Multi-objective energy-efficient dense deployment in Wireless Sensor Networks using a hybrid problem-specific MOEA/D

Applied Soft Computing
A two-stage preference-based evolutionary multi-objective approach for capability planning problems

Knowledge-Based Systems
Multi-objective energy-efficient dense deployment in Wireless Sensor Networks using a hybrid problem-specific MOEA/D

Applied Soft Computing
Using objective reduction and interactive procedure to handle many-objective optimization problems

Applied Soft Computing
Handling qualitative aspects in Unequal Area Facility Layout Problem: An Interactive Genetic Algorithm

Applied Soft Computing
An integrated approach to automated innovization for discovering useful design principles: Case studies from engineering

Applied Soft Computing
Discovering driving strategies with a multiobjective optimization algorithm

Applied Soft Computing

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

With the advent of efficient techniques for multi-objective evolutionary optimization (EMO), real-world search and optimization problems are being increasingly solved for multiple conflicting objectives. During the past decade of research and application, most emphasis has been spent on finding the complete Pareto-optimal set, although EMO researchers were always aware of the importance of procedures which would help choose one particular solution from the Pareto-optimal set for implementation. This is also one of the main issues on which the classical and EMO philosophies are divided on. In this paper, we address this long-standing issue and suggest an interactive EMO procedure which will involve a decision-maker in the evolutionary optimization process and help choose a single solution at the end. This study uses many year's of research on EMO and would hopefully encourage both practitioners and researchers to pay more attention in viewing the multi-objective optimization as a aggregate task of optimization and decision-making.