Artificial Intelligence
Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Argument-based critics and recommenders: a qualitative perspective on user support systems
Data & Knowledge Engineering - Special issue: WIDM 2004
Integrating Dialectical and Accrual Modes of Argumentation
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Argumentation system allowing suspend/resume of an argumentation line
ArgMAS'10 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
Open texture and argumentation: what makes an argument persuasive?
Logic Programs, Norms and Action
Aggregating evidence about the positive and negative effects of treatments
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Modelling argument accrual with possibilistic uncertainty in a logic programming setting
Information Sciences: an International Journal
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Recently, the notion of accrual of arguments has received some attention from the argumentation community. Three principles for argument accrual have been identified as necessary to hold in argumentation frameworks. In this paper we propose an approach to model the accrual of arguments in the context of Defeasible Logic Programming, a logic programming approach to argumentation which has proven to be successful for many real-world applications. We will analyze the above mentioned principles in the context of our proposal, studying other interesting properties.