Towards a standard upper ontology
Proceedings of the international conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems - Volume 2001
Qualitative Representation of Change
COSIT '97 Proceedings of the International Conference on Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS
A Taxonomy of Granular Partitions
COSIT 2001 Proceedings of the International Conference on Spatial Information Theory: Foundations of Geographic Information Science
Granularity, scale and collectivity: when size does and does not matter
Journal of Biomedical Informatics - Special issue: Biomedical ontologies
Towards a taxonomy of movement patterns
Information Visualization
A tempora mereology for distinguishing between integral objects and portions of stuff
AAAI'07 Proceedings of the 22nd national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
Dynamic collectives and their collective dynamics
COSIT'05 Proceedings of the 2005 international conference on Spatial Information Theory
COSIT'05 Proceedings of the 2005 international conference on Spatial Information Theory
What is the region occupied by a set of points?
GIScience'06 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Geographic Information Science
From collective intentionality to intentional collectives: An ontological perspective
Cognitive Systems Research
ER'11 Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Conceptual modeling
Modeling consistency of spatio-temporal graphs
Data & Knowledge Engineering
International Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems
Semantic trajectories modeling and analysis
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We are surrounded by collective phenomena, with examples existing on many levels of granularity. Despite our frequent experiences of such phenomena they seem to have been largely ignored within the field of ontology. In this paper, existing ontologies are examined to determine the extent to which they can adequately represent collective phenomena, and are found wanting in a number of important respects. An adequate representation of collective phenomena must do justice to the often subtle relationship that exists between a collective viewed as a whole and its constitution as a plurality of individual participants. An important prerequisite for this is to determine the range of variation that exists within the broad class of collectives. Numerous examples of collective phenomena have been studied to extract appropriate classification criteria. The results from this study are used to produce a new typology of collectives which is intended to establish a basis for the adequate treatment of collectives within an ontology. To illustrate the classification system we show how it can be used to highlight the significant distinctions between a suitably diverse range of examples. The paper concludes with a set of further research questions that have been raised during the development of the taxonomy.