Scenario-based performance analysis of routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc networks
MobiCom '99 Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking
GPSR: greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks
MobiCom '00 Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
BROADNETS '04 Proceedings of the First International Conference on Broadband Networks
DIAR: a dynamic interference aware routing protocol for IEEE 802.11-based mobile ad hoc networks
MSN'05 Proceedings of the First international conference on Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Networks
Position-based routing in ad hoc networks
IEEE Communications Magazine
Ranging in a dense multipath environment using an UWB radio link
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
Optimal power control, scheduling, and routing in UWB networks
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Ultra-Wideband (UWB) is a promising technology for wireless personal area networks (WPANs) and Sensor networks. In particular, it is a viable candidate for short/medium-range communications. These motivations lead IEEE and scientific community to increase research on UWB technology. Many studies have been already addressed UWB physical and MAC problematic, but, at the present, many challenges are yet opened on the UWB routing level. However, traditional routing approach based on hop count or geometric criterions can be inadequate due to mutual interference affecting UWB nodes. The main goal of our work is to propose a new routing protocol, called Interference Aware-based Ad-hoc on Demand Distance Vector (IA-AODV), based on the concept of interference: the optimum route is chosen on the basis of the minimum perceived interference. Two distinct metrics are proposed: the first one based on the global interference perceived by a node (NI) and the other one based on the link interference (LI). To test the proposed protocol a ns-2 based simulator was realized. The two proposed metrics were compared with the AODV protocol in terms of packet delivery ratio, end-to-end delay and normalized overhead. Simulation results show as LI metric outperforms the others in all considered scenarios: only in few cases, LI IA-AODV presents an overhead slightly higher than AODV.