Artificial intelligence and psychoanalysis: a new alliance
The artificial intelligence debate: false starts, real foundations
Understanding intelligence
Blueprints for high availability: designing resilient distributed systems
Blueprints for high availability: designing resilient distributed systems
How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence (Bradford Books)
How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence (Bradford Books)
Simulating the Mind: A Technical Neuropsychoanalytical Approach
Simulating the Mind: A Technical Neuropsychoanalytical Approach
A Bionic Model for Human-like Machine Perception
A Bionic Model for Human-like Machine Perception
IJCAI'91 Proceedings of the 12th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
A review on system architectures for sensor fusion applications
SEUS'07 Proceedings of the 5th IFIP WG 10.2 international conference on Software technologies for embedded and ubiquitous systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
An approach to deal with increasing complexity in control tasks is used the human mind as an archetype for a reasoning unit. In this article, psychoanalysis is used as theoretical framework for the described model. The main elements are Id, Ego, and Super-Ego. This article deals with failsafe aspects of such a complex architecture. What will happen if one or even two of the main elements fail to operate. The technical architecture presented divides the model into two parts-one fail-safe part with the Id and selected elements of the Ego and the other one with the rest of the Ego and the Super-Ego. The advantage in doing so is that while the latter one is able to perform complex tasks, the first one guarantees that-in case of an error-the system will not fail totally.