An introduction to differential evolution
New ideas in optimization
Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Journal of Global Optimization
Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization (Natural Computing Series)
Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization (Natural Computing Series)
Multi-objective test problems, linkages, and evolutionary methodologies
Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
A constraint handling approach for the differential evolution algorithm
CEC '02 Proceedings of the Evolutionary Computation on 2002. CEC '02. Proceedings of the 2002 Congress - Volume 02
A fast and effective method for pruning of non-dominated solutions in many-objective problems
PPSN'06 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature
Reducing the run-time complexity of multiobjective EAs: The NSGA-II and other algorithms
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans
Multi-objective optimization with artificial weed colonies
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
ISNN'13 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Advances in Neural Networks - Volume Part II
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper presents results for the CEC 2009 Special Session on "Performance Assessment of Constrained / Bound Constrained Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms" when Generalized Differential Evolution 3 has been used to solve a given set of test problems. The set consist of 23 problems having two, three, or five objectives. Problems have different properties in the sense of separability, modality, and geometry of the Pareto-front. The most of the problems are unconstrained, but 10 problems have one or two constraints. According to the numerical results with an inverted generational distance, Generalized Differential Evolution 3 performed well with all the problems except with one five objective problem. It was noticed that a low crossover control parameter value provides the best average results according to the metric.