A pragmatic structure for research articles
ICPW '07 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Pragmatic web
Towards automatic extraction of epistemic items from scientific publications
Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
Towards automatic thematic sheets based on discursive categories in biomedical literature
Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics
A three-way perspective on scientific discourse annotation for knowledge extraction
ACL '12 Proceedings of the Workshop on Detecting Structure in Scholarly Discourse
Hi-index | 0.00 |
To manage the flood of information that threatens to engulf (life-)scientists, an abundance of computer-aided tools are being developed. These tools aim to provide access to the knowledge conveyed within a collection of research papers, without actually having to read the papers. Many of these tools focus on text mining, by looking for specific named-entities that have scientific meaning, and relationships between these. An overview of the current state of the art is given in Rebholz-Schuhmann et al. (2005) and Couto et al. (2003). Typically, these tools identify a list of sentences containing relationships between two specific named-entities that can be found using rules or a thesaurus of synonyms. These sentences represent an overview of the interactions that are known with a specific entity, thus precluding the need for an exhaustive literature study. For example, the following are a few sentences that have been found using a typical text mining tool for the relationship 'p53 activates*': 1. The p53 tumor suppressor protein exerts most of its anti-tumorigenic activity by transcriptionally activating several pro-apoptotic genes. 2. We found that p53 ... activates[,] the promoter of the myosin VI gene.