COBRA: a hybrid method for software cost estimation, benchmarking, and risk assessment
Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Software engineering
Software Cost Estimation with Cocomo II with Cdrom
Software Cost Estimation with Cocomo II with Cdrom
Globalization by Chunking: A Quantitative Approach
IEEE Software
Cost estimation for global software development
Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Economics driven software engineering research
Coordination Implications of Software Architecture in a Global Software Development Project
WICSA '08 Proceedings of the Seventh Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA 2008)
Developing an Inter-site Coordination Index for Global Software Development
ICGSE '08 Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering
ICGSE '09 Proceedings of the 2009 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering
Distributed global development parametric cost modeling
ICSP'07 Proceedings of the 2007 international conference on Software process
Architectural task allocation in distributed environment: a traceability perspective
Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Software Engineering
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Systematic task allocation to different development sites in global software development projects can open business and engineering perspectives and help to reduce risks and problems inherent in distributed development. Relying only on a single evaluation criterion such as development cost when distributing tasks to development sites has shown to be very risky and often does not lead to successful solutions in the long run. Task allocation in global software projects is challenging due to a multitude of impact factors and constraints. Systematic allocation decisions require the ability to evaluate and compare task allocation alternatives and to effectively establish customized task allocation practices in an organization. In this article, we present a customizable process for task allocation evaluation that is based on results from a systematic interview study with practitioners. In this process, the relevant criteria for evaluating task allocation alternatives are derived by applying principles from goal-oriented measurement. In addition, the customization of the process is demonstrated, related work and limitations are sketched, and an outlook on future work is given.