CHI '94 Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Evaluating ontological decisions with OntoClean
Communications of the ACM - Ontology: different ways of representing the same concept
Ontological Engineering
Semantic enhancement for legal information retrieval: Iuriservice performance
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
How to Design Better Ontology Metrics
ESWC '07 Proceedings of the 4th European conference on The Semantic Web: Research and Applications
An Ontology-Based Decision Support System for Judges
Proceedings of the 2009 conference on Law, Ontologies and the Semantic Web: Channelling the Legal Information Flood
Selection of ontologies for the semantic web
ICWE'03 Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on Web engineering
OPJK into PROTON: legal domain ontology integration into an upper-level ontology
OTM'05 Proceedings of the 2005 OTM Confederated international conference on On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems
OTM'06 Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: AWeSOMe, CAMS, COMINF, IS, KSinBIT, MIOS-CIAO, MONET - Volume Part II
Iuriservice: an intelligent frequently asked questions system to assist newly appointed judges
Law and the Semantic Web
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Current ontology methodologies offer guidance towards knowledge acquisition, ontology development (design and conceptualization), formalization, evaluation, evolution and maintenance. Nevertheless, these methodologies describe most of expert involvements within ontology validation rather vaguely. The use of tailored usability methods for ontology evaluation could offer the establishment of certain quality measurements and aid the evaluation of modelling decisions, prior ontology implementation. This paper describes the experimental evaluation of a legal ontology, the Ontology of Professional Judicial Knowledge (OPJK), with the SUS questionnaire, a usability evaluation questionnaire tailored to ontology evaluation.