Ontology Evaluation through Assessment of Inferred Statements: Study of a Prototypical Implementation of an Ontology Questionnaire for OWL DL Ontologies

Authors:
Viktoria Pammer;Stefanie Lindstaedt
Affiliations:
Knowledge Management Institute, TU Graz,;Know-Center,
Venue:
KSEM '09 Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management
Year:
2009

Citing 9
Cited 0

Knowledge engineering and management: the CommonKADS methodology

Knowledge engineering and management: the CommonKADS methodology
Building a Chemical Ontology Using Methontology and the Ontology Design Environment

IEEE Intelligent Systems
Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner

Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web
Laconic and Precise Justifications in OWL

ISWC '08 Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on The Semantic Web
MoKi: The Enterprise Modelling Wiki

ESWC 2009 Heraklion Proceedings of the 6th European Semantic Web Conference on The Semantic Web: Research and Applications
Swoop: A Web Ontology Editing Browser

Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web
Finding all justifications of OWL DL entailments

ISWC'07/ASWC'07 Proceedings of the 6th international The semantic web and 2nd Asian conference on Asian semantic web conference
Modelling ontology evaluation and validation

ESWC'06 Proceedings of the 3rd European conference on The Semantic Web: research and applications
Unit tests for ontologies

OTM'06 Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: AWeSOMe, CAMS, COMINF, IS, KSinBIT, MIOS-CIAO, MONET - Volume Part II

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Evaluation and consequent revision of ontologies is a critical task in the process of ontology engineering. We argue the necessity and merits of reviewing implicitly entailed knowledge as part of a methodical evaluation. We study this process by means of a prototypical implementation for OWL DL ontologies, called ontology questionnaire, and discuss support for dealing with unwanted inferences based on experiences with applying this questionnaire in some real-world modelling scenarios.