Generation of biomedical arguments for lay readers

Authors:
Nancy Green
Affiliations:
University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina
Venue:
INLG '06 Proceedings of the Fourth International Natural Language Generation Conference
Year:
2006

Citing 8
Cited 3

Integrating discourse and domain knowledge for document drafting

ICAIL '99 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Summarizing scientific articles: experiments with relevance and rhetorical status

Computational Linguistics - Summarization
Argumentation in Explanations to Logical Problems

ICCS '01 Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Sciences-Part I
Bayesian Artificial Intelligence

Bayesian Artificial Intelligence
A Bayesian network coding scheme for annotating biomedical information presented to genetic counseling clients

Journal of Biomedical Informatics
An empirical study of the influence of argument conciseness on argument effectiveness

ACL '00 Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
Using argumentation strategies in automated argument generation

INLG '00 Proceedings of the first international conference on Natural language generation - Volume 14
Content ordering in the generation of persuasive discourse

IJCAI'97 Proceedings of the Fifteenth international joint conference on Artifical intelligence - Volume 2

A simple domain-independent probabilistic approach to generation

EMNLP '10 Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Concept-to-text generation via discriminative reranking

ACL '12 Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Long Papers - Volume 1
A global model for concept-to-text generation

Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper presents the design of a discourse generator that plans the content and organization of lay-oriented genetic counseling documents containing arguments, and an experiment to evaluate the arguments. Due to the separation of domain, argument, and genre-specific concerns and the methodology used for acquiring a domain model, this approach should be applicable to argument generation in other domains.