Beyond Market Baskets: Generalizing Association Rules to Dependence Rules
Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
The Category-Demand Effects of Price Promotions
Marketing Science
Modeling Consumer Demand for Variety
Marketing Science
Building an Association Rules Framework to Improve Product Assortment Decisions
Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
Direct and indirect effects of retail promotions on sales and profits in the do-it-yourself market
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Electronic promotion to new customers using mkNN learning
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Grocery Product Recommendations from Natural Language Inputs
UMAP '09 Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization: formerly UM and AH
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Hi-index | 12.05 |
In text books as well as in the business literature, market basket analysis is often promoted as a means to obtain product associations to base a retailer's promotion strategy on. They argue that associated products with a high lift/interest can be promoted effectively by only discounting just one of the two products. Implicitly, they argue that market basket analysis automatically identifies complements. In this research, we show that this implicit assumption does not hold. Our empirical analysis reveals that market basket analysis identifies as many substitutes as complements. Therefore, market basket analysis cannot be used to build a promotion expert system for retailers. Instead, we advice to base the promotion strategy on cross-price elasticities. We conduct this research using scanner data of a large European retailer. Multivariate time-series techniques are used to identify both short-run as well as long-run (persistent) effects of promotions.