Decision problems for patterns
Journal of Computer and System Sciences
Mastering regular expressions
Polynomial Time Inference of General Pattern Languages
STACS '84 Proceedings of the Symposium of Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science
On Extended Regular Expressions
LATA '09 Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language and Automata Theory and Applications
| Hi-index | 0.89 |
A pattern is a finite string of constant and variable symbols. The language generated by a pattern is the set of all strings of constant symbols which can be obtained from the pattern by substituting (non-empty) strings for variables. The pattern languages are one of language family which is orthogonal to the Chomsky-type languages hierarchy. They have many applications, such as the extended regular expressions, for instance, in languages Perl, awk, etc. They are well applicable in machine learning as well. There are erasing and non-erasing patterns are used. For non-erasing pattern languages the equivalence of languages is decidable but the inclusion problem for them is undecidable. In extended regular expressions one can use union, concatenation and Kleene star to make more complex patterns. It is also known, that the equivalence problem of extended regular expressions is undecidable. However, the problem, whether the equivalence is decidable for patterns using only concatenation and star still open. In this paper there are some interesting results about inclusion properties and equivalences of some kinds of erasing and non-erasing pattern languages. We show that the equivalence problem of non-erasing patterns in some cases can be reduced to the decidability problem of some very special inclusion properties. These results may be useful to decide whether the language equivalence of non-erasing star-patterns is decidable or not.