Object Recognition from Local Scale-Invariant Features
ICCV '99 Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision-Volume 2 - Volume 2
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
International Journal of Computer Vision
Localization Based on Building Recognition
CVPR '05 Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) - Workshops - Volume 03
PCA-SIFT: a more distinctive representation for local image descriptors
CVPR'04 Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE computer society conference on Computer vision and pattern recognition
SURF: speeded up robust features
ECCV'06 Proceedings of the 9th European conference on Computer Vision - Volume Part I
Vision-based global localization and mapping for mobile robots
IEEE Transactions on Robotics
Swarm-supported outdoor localization with sparse visual data
Robotics and Autonomous Systems
A comparative evaluation of feature detectors on historic repeat photography
ISVC'11 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Advances in visual computing - Volume Part II
Time-aware co-training for indoors localization in visual lifelogs
MM '11 Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Multimedia
Global localization with non-quantized local image features
Robotics and Autonomous Systems
Robotics and Autonomous Systems
Cleaning robot navigation using panoramic views and particle clouds as landmarks
Robotics and Autonomous Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper, we address the problem of outdoor, appearance-based topological localization, particularly over long periods of time where seasonal changes alter the appearance of the environment. We investigate a straightforward method that relies on local image features to compare single-image pairs. We first look into which of the dominating image feature algorithms, SIFT or the more recent SURF, that is most suitable for this task. We then fine-tune our localization algorithm in terms of accuracy, and also introduce the epipolar constraint to further improve the result. The final localization algorithm is applied on multiple data sets, each consisting of a large number of panoramic images, which have been acquired over a period of nine months with large seasonal changes. The final localization rate in the single-image matching, cross-seasonal case is between 80% to 95%.