The Anatomy of the Grid: Enabling Scalable Virtual Organizations
International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications
Virtual Lab for fMRI: Bridging the Usability Gap
E-SCIENCE '06 Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing
Future Generation Computer Systems
Flexible and Efficient Workflow Deployment of Data-Intensive Applications On Grids With MOTEUR
International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications
Workflow Integration in VL-e Medical
CBMS '08 Proceedings of the 2008 21st IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems
Application of grid computing to parameter sweeps and optimizations in molecular modeling
Future Generation Computer Systems
Special section: Medical imaging on grids
Future Generation Computer Systems
A virtual laboratory for medical image analysis
IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine
Evolution of grid-based services for Diffusion Tensor Image analysis
Future Generation Computer Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analysis is usually carried out with standard software packages (e.g., FSL and SPM) implementing the General Linear Model (GLM) computation. Yet, the validity of an analysis may still largely depend on the parameterization of those tools, which has, however, received little attention from researchers. In this paper we study the influence of three of those parameters, namely (i) the size of the spatial smoothing kernel, (ii) the hemodynamic response function delay and (iii) the degrees of freedom of the fMRI-to-anatomical scan registration. In addition, two different values of acquisition parameters (echo times) are compared. The study is performed on a data set of 11 subjects, sweeping a significant range of parameters. It involves almost one CPU year and produces 1.4 Terabytes of data. Thanks to a grid deployment of the FSL FEAT application, this compute and data intensive problem can be handled and the execution time is reduced to less than a week. Results suggest that optimal parameter values for detecting activation in the amygdalae deviate from the default typically adopted in such studies. Moreover, robust results indicate no significant difference between brain activation maps obtained with the two echo times.