Performance analysis of routing protocols for vehicle safety communications on the freeway

Authors:
Niansheng Liu;Huihuan Qian;Jingyu Yan;Yangsheng Xu
Affiliations:
School of Computer Engineering, Jimei University, Xiamen, China and Department of Mechanical and Automation Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong;Department of Mechanical and Automation Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong;Department of Mechanical and Automation Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong;Department of Mechanical and Automation Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong and Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Integration Technology, CAS, CUHK, Shenzhen, Ch ...
Venue:
ASID'09 Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Anti-Counterfeiting, security, and identification in communication
Year:
2009

Citing 4
Cited 0

Highly dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers

SIGCOMM '94 Proceedings of the conference on Communications architectures, protocols and applications
A survey of secure mobile Ad Hoc routing protocols

IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
Routing protocols for vehicular Ad Hoc networks in rural areas

IEEE Communications Magazine
A simulation study of table-driven and on-demand routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks

IEEE Network: The Magazine of Global Internetworking

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In a freeway vehicular ad hoc network (VANET) environment, an efficient ad hoc routing protocol plays a very important role to enhance the safety of passengers. This paper presents the latest result of simulation model of three mobile ad hoc routing protocols: destination-sequenced distance-vector protocol (DSDV), dynamic source routing (DSR) and ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV). The performance of three protocols under constant bit rate traffic is evaluated and compared with five quality indices. The simulation results show that both the reactive routing protocols, DSR and AODV, have better performance than the proactive routing protocol DSDV. DSDV has largest packet loss rate and smallest system throughput among the three protocols. This paper also shows that the effect of varying mobility has undeniably influenced the performance of both reactive routing protocols. DSR is better in the protocol overhead than AODV. However, there is critical jitter variation in the DSR. As a whole, AODV is more appropriate than DSR for the freeway VANET.