On the efficiency of local and global communication in modular robots

Authors:
Ricardo Franco Mendoza Garcia;Ulrik Pagh Schultz;Kasper Stoy
Affiliations:
Modular Robotics Lab, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark and Escuela Universitaria de Ingenieria Mecanica, Universidad de Tarapaca, Arica, Chile;Modular Robotics Lab, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark;Modular Robotics Lab, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
Venue:
IROS'09 Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/RSJ international conference on Intelligent robots and systems
Year:
2009

Citing 2
Cited 1

Automatic Configuration Recognition Methods in Modular Robots

International Journal of Robotics Research
Reusable electronics and adaptable communication as implemented in the odin modular robot

ICRA'09 Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE international conference on Robotics and Automation

Macro Programming a Spatial Computer with Bayesian Networks

ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (TAAS)

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

As exchange of information is essential to modular robots, deciding between local or global communication is a common design choice. This choice, however, still lacks theoretical support. In this paper we analyse the efficiency of local and global communication in modular robots. To this end, we use parameters to describe the topology of modular robots, develop a probabilistic model of local communication using these parameters and, using a model of global communication from literature, compare the transmission times of local and global communication in different robots. Based on our results, we conclude that global communication is convenient for centralized control approaches and local communication is convenient for distributed control approaches. In addition, we conclude that global is in general convenient for low-connectivity configurations, such as chains, trees or limbs, and that local can be faster than global when communicating between distant modules which are not too far apart. Finally, we discuss the potential of flexible communication topologies, which can provide optimal topologies for many configurations, such as those we can split into bodies and limbs.