Wdm and directed star arboricity

  • Authors:
  • Omid Amini;FrÉdÉric Havet;Florian Huc;StÉphan ThomassÉ

  • Affiliations:
  • Projet mascotte, cnrs/inria/unsa, inria sophia-antipolis, 2004 route des lucioles bp 93, 06902 sophia-antipolis cedex, france (e-mail: oamini@sophia.inria.fr, fhavet@sophia.inria.fr, fhuc@sophia.i ...;Projet mascotte, cnrs/inria/unsa, inria sophia-antipolis, 2004 route des lucioles bp 93, 06902 sophia-antipolis cedex, france (e-mail: oamini@sophia.inria.fr, fhavet@sophia.inria.fr, fhuc@sophia.i ...;Projet mascotte, cnrs/inria/unsa, inria sophia-antipolis, 2004 route des lucioles bp 93, 06902 sophia-antipolis cedex, france (e-mail: oamini@sophia.inria.fr, fhavet@sophia.inria.fr, fhuc@sophia.i ...;Lirmm, 161 rue ada, montpellier, france (e-mail: thomasse@lirmm.fr)

  • Venue:
  • Combinatorics, Probability and Computing
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

A digraph is m-labelled if every arc is labelled by an integer in {1,. . ., m}. Motivated by wavelength assignment for multicasts in optical networks, we introduce and study n-fibre colourings of labelled digraphs. These are colourings of the arcs of D such that at each vertex v, and for each colour α, in(v, α) + out(v, α) ≤ n with in(v, α) the number of arcs coloured α entering v and out(v, α) the number of labels l such that there is at least one arc of label l leaving v and coloured with α. The problem is to find the minimum number of colours λn(D) such that the m-labelled digraph D has an n-fibre colouring. In the particular case when D is 1-labelled, λ1(D) is called the directed star arboricity of D, and is denoted by dst(D). We first show that dst(D) ≤ 2Δ−(D)+1, and conjecture that if Δ−(D) ≥ 2, then dst(D) ≤ 2Δ−(D). We also prove that for a subcubic digraph D, then dst(D) ≤ 3, and that if Δ+(D), Δ−(D) ≤ 2, then dst(D) ≤ 4. Finally, we study λn(m, k) = max{λn(D) | D is m-labelled and Δ−(D) ≤ k}. We show that if m ≥ n, then $\ds \bigl\lceil\frac{m}{n}\bigl\lceil \frac{k}{n}\bigr\rceil + \frac{k}{n} \bigr\rceil\leq \lambda_n(m, k) \leq\bigl\lceil\frac{m}{n}\bigl\lceil \frac{k}{n}\bigr\rceil + \frac{k}{n} \bigr\rceil + C \frac{m^2\log k}{n}$ for some constant C. We conjecture that the lower bound should be the correct value of λn(m, k).