Active shape models—their training and application
Computer Vision and Image Understanding
Age classification from facial images
Computer Vision and Image Understanding
Face Recognition Using Active Appearance Models
ECCV '98 Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Computer Vision-Volume II - Volume II
ECCV '98 Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Computer Vision-Volume II - Volume II
Interpreting Face Images Using Active Appearance Models
FG '98 Proceedings of the 3rd. International Conference on Face & Gesture Recognition
MORPH: A Longitudinal Image Database of Normal Adult Age-Progression
FGR '06 Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition
Automatic Age Estimation Based on Facial Aging Patterns
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Comparative evaluation of automatic age-progression methodologies
EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing
A comparative study of active appearance model annotation schemes for the face
Proceedings of the Seventh Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing
Ensemble of global and local features for face age estimation
ISNN'11 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Advances in neural networks - Volume Part II
A computer approach for face aging problems
AI'10 Proceedings of the 23rd Canadian conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence
ICIC'11 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Advanced Intelligent Computing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper, we introduce a novel age estimation technique that combines Active Appearance Models (AAMs) and Support Vector Machines (SVMs), to dramatically improve the accuracy of age estimation over the current state-of-the-art techniques. In this method, characteristics of the input images, face image, are interpreted as feature vectors by AAMs, which are used to discriminate between childhood and adulthood, prior to age estimation. Faces classified as adults are passed to the adult age-determination function and the others are passed to the child age-determination function. Compared to published results, this method yields the highest accuracy recognition rates, both in overall mean-absolute error (MAE) and mean-absolute error for the two periods of human development: childhood and adulthood.