Dynamic cache allocation algorithm and replacement policy for reliable multicast network

Authors:
Jingyu Zhang;Zhishu Li;Liangyin Chen
Affiliations:
School of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China;School of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China;School of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Venue:
WiCOM'09 Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Wireless communications, networking and mobile computing
Year:
2009

Citing 3
Cited 0

Aggregate traffic performance with active queue management and drop from tail

ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
Comparison of Tail Drop and Active Queue Management Performance for Bulk-Data and Web-Like Internet Traffic

ISCC '01 Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications
Caching policy design and cache allocation in active reliable multicast

Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.01

Visualization

Abstract

In the field of reliable multicast, the design of most current router cache management protocols is limited by network environment with single multicast group. With such protocols, expected targets can not be achieved in Internet environment in which a router is shared by a plurality of multicast groups. ACP is a router cache management protocol suitable for the environment shared by multiple groups. In Internet in which there exists frequently emerged bursty data flow, however, ACP allocation algorithm has such drawbacks as slow convergence and instable allocation results when the number of multicast groups or group members changes. Based on the design and implementation of a dynamic cache allocation algorithm as well as time-out algorithm and packet discard policy, a novel Adaptive and Active Reliable Multicast Protocol (AARM for short) suitable for large-scale multicast network was proposed. Simulation results show that AARM will achieve significant enhancement of performance for multicast network in terms of delayed restoration, bandwidth consumption and network throughput, etc. compared with ACP.