Supervisory control of a class of discrete event processes
SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization
On observability of discrete-event systems
Information Sciences: an International Journal - Robotics and Automation/Control Series
Supervisory Control of Distributed Systems: Conflict Resolution
Discrete Event Dynamic Systems
Introduction to Discrete Event Systems
Introduction to Discrete Event Systems
Process operating mode monitoring: switching online the right controller
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper, we propose a framework for designing suitable switching control decisions for discrete event systems (DES) whose structures change as they develop in different operating modes. Control decisions consist of either an event in a sequence to occur enabling an event or preventing the event from taking place disabling an event. Our contribution enables to adopt different modeling approaches and ensures switching between all designed process models when there is commutation between the operating modes. Thus, in the context of supervisory control theory (SCT), we propose that each model automaton represents process functionning in a specific operating mode. Specifications imposed on any operating mode could be conflicting. An attractive alternative is switching control, in which a different controller is applied to each operating mode [P. Charbonnaud, F. Rotella, S. Medar. Process Operating mode Monitoring Process: Switching Online the Right Controller, IEEE transactions on systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C 31(1) pp 77-86. 2002; M. Zefran, J. Burdick, Design of switching controllers for systems with changing dynamics, in: Proceedings of the 37th conference on Decision and control, 1998, pp. 2113-2118]. Control of process functionning means that both process and specification models must be associated with one specific operating mode. Based on supervisory control theory, our work focuses on operating mode management in particular when the process is subject to failure. The adopted approach (multi-model) assumes that only one attempted operating mode is activated at any one time, while the others are considered desactivated. The problem of commutation and tracking between all designed models (process and specification) is formalised by the proposed framework. In this context, several questions are raised. Is the process engaged in a state which is compatible with the atteined mode ? Are the specifications consistant with each starting state ?. Are the specification conflicting ? Can all defined states be reachable ? To answer correctly these questions, a mode switching mechanism must be formalised.