Cooperative learning techniques in CS1: design and experimental evaluation
Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Active and cooperative learning: tips and tricks (part I)
ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
Techniques for active learning in CS courses
Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges
Active and cooperative learning: more tips and tricks (part II)
ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
A systematic approach to active and cooperative learning in CS1 and its effects on CS2
Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Active and cooperative learning: further tips and tricks (part 3)
ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
Active and cooperative learning: final tips and tricks (part IV)
ITiCSE-WGR '06 Working group reports on ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science education
Active learning sheets for a beginner's course on reasoning about imperative programs
Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Treisman workshops and student performance in CS
Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Interactive visualization for the active learning classroom
Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Student-generated active-learning exercises
Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education
Process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) for computer science
Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We present our experience in transforming a software development course and a systems software course from a traditional, lecture-based style to an active-learning format. We outline the common changes that were made in both courses, and provide a summary of the active-learning techniques that were successfully employed. We provide quantitative and qualitative evidence that this transformation was a success. In both courses, student grades and overall satisfaction with the course were increased with the transformation to active learning, despite teaching essentially the same curriculum.