MSLiP: a computer code for the multistage stochastic linear programming problem
Mathematical Programming: Series A and B
Scenarios and policy aggregation in optimization under uncertainty
Mathematics of Operations Research
Applying the progressive hedging algorithm to stochastic generalized networks
Annals of Operations Research
Approximate scenario solutions in the progressive hedging algorithm: a numerical study
Annals of Operations Research
Parallel decomposition of multistage stochastic programming problems
Mathematical Programming: Series A and B
On convergence of an augmented Lagrangian decomposition method for sparse convex optimization
Mathematics of Operations Research
A Decomposition Method Based on SQP for a Class of Multistage Stochastic Nonlinear Programs
SIAM Journal on Optimization
A Lagrangian Dual Method with Self-Concordant Barriers for Multi-Stage Stochastic Convex Programming
Mathematical Programming: Series A and B
INFORMS Journal on Computing
Hi-index | 7.29 |
A progressive hedging method incorporated with self-concordant barrier for solving multistage stochastic programs is proposed recently by Zhao [G. Zhao, A Lagrangian dual method with self-concordant barrier for multistage stochastic convex nonlinear programming, Math. Program. 102 (2005) 1-24]. The method relaxes the nonanticipativity constraints by the Lagrangian dual approach and smoothes the Lagrangian dual function by self-concordant barrier functions. The convergence and polynomial-time complexity of the method have been established. Although the analysis is done on stochastic convex programming, the method can be applied to the nonconvex situation. We discuss some details on the implementation of this method in this paper, including when to terminate the solution of unconstrained subproblems with special structure and how to perform a line search procedure for a new dual estimate effectively. In particular, the method is used to solve some multistage stochastic nonlinear test problems. The collection of test problems also contains two practical examples from the literature. We report the results of our preliminary numerical experiments. As a comparison, we also solve all test problems by the well-known progressive hedging method.