Response time and display rate in human performance with computers
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
The myth of the infinitely fast machine
Proceedings of Third Conference of the British Computer Society Human-Interactio on People and computers III
A performance model of system delay and user strategy selection
CHI '92 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
HCI'92 Proceedings of the conference on People and computers VII
Coupling the user interfaces of a multiuser program
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)
Que Sera Sera: the problem of the future perfect in open and cooperative systems
HCI '94 Proceedings of the conference on People and computers IX
Delays and temporal incoherence due to the mediated status-status mappings
ACM SIGCHI Bulletin
Introduction to Default Logic
Dealing with different time scales in formal specifications
IWSSD '91 Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on Software specification and design
Human-Computer Interaction
Preferred subtheories: an extended logical framework for default reasoning
IJCAI'89 Proceedings of the 11th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2
Towards a Ubiquitous Semantics of Interaction: Phenomenology, Scenarios, and Traces
DSV-IS '02 Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Interactive Systems. Design, Specification, and Verification
CT '01 Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Cognitive Technology: Instruments of Mind
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Time plays an important role in interactive systems, but can be difficult to specify, particularly where temporal properties exist at several different time granularities. The relationship between different time granularities is complex and translation between them can be difficult. In this paper, we discuss this relationship and highlight the way in which translation between different time granularities within a single specification may have important consequences for system behaviour. Using the notation TRIO≠, we provide examples from an interactive case study of the ways in which system behaviour may be influenced, and illustrate some of the potential difficulties which arise in the specification of temporal properties such as pace and regularity.