Word sense disambiguation for free-text indexing using a massive semantic network
CIKM '93 Proceedings of the second international conference on Information and knowledge management
Using semantic contents and WordNet in image retrieval
Proceedings of the 20th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
Supporting ontological analysis of taxonomic relationships
Data & Knowledge Engineering - ER2000
Object Recognition as Machine Translation: Learning a Lexicon for a Fixed Image Vocabulary
ECCV '02 Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Computer Vision-Part IV
Semantics-sensitive Retrieval for Digital Picture Libraries
Semantics-sensitive Retrieval for Digital Picture Libraries
Word sense disambiguation using Conceptual Density
COLING '96 Proceedings of the 16th conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 1
Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy
IJCAI'95 Proceedings of the 14th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
Determining trust in media-rich websites using semantic similarity
Multimedia Tools and Applications
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Semantic interpretation of image is incomplete without some mechanism for understanding semantic content that is not directly visible. For this reason, human assisted content-annotation through natural language is an attachment of textual description (i.e. a keyword, or a simple sentence) to image. However, keyword-based retrieval is in the level of syntactic pattern matching. In other words, dissimilarity computation among terms is usually done by using string matching not concept matching. In this paper, we present a solution for qualitative measurement of concept-based retrieval of annotated image. We propose a method for computerized conceptual similarity distance calculation in WordNet space. Also we have introduced method that applied similarity measurement on concept-based image retrieval. When tested on a image set of Microsoft's 'Design Gallery Live', proposed method outperforms other approach.