GUM: a portable parallel implementation of Haskell
PLDI '96 Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 1996 conference on Programming language design and implementation
POPL '96 Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages
Research Directions in Parallel Functional Programming
Research Directions in Parallel Functional Programming
Patterns and skeletons for parallel and distributed computing
Patterns and skeletons for parallel and distributed computing
Parallelism abstractions in eden
Patterns and skeletons for parallel and distributed computing
MPI: A Message-Passing Interface
MPI: A Message-Passing Interface
Parallel and Distributed Haskells
Journal of Functional Programming
Algorithm + strategy = parallelism
Journal of Functional Programming
Parallel functional programming in Eden
Journal of Functional Programming
Haskell on a shared-memory multiprocessor
Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGPLAN workshop on Haskell
Dynamic task generation and transformation within a nestable workpool skeleton
Euro-Par'06 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Parallel Processing
Scheduling light-weight parallelism in ArTCoP
PADL'08 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Practical aspects of declarative languages
Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation
Orthogonal serialisation for Haskell
IFL'10 Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Implementation and application of functional languages
Functional high performance financial IT: the hiperfit research center in copenhagen
TFP'11 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Trends in Functional Programming
Eden --- parallel functional programming with haskell
CEFP'11 Proceedings of the 4th Summer School conference on Central European Functional Programming School
| Hi-index | 0.01 |
We present a low-level coordination language for Haskell which can be used as an implementation language for parallel Haskell extensions. It has been developed in the context of the latest Eden implementation (based on the Glasgow-Haskell-Compiler, GHC, version 6) and it is thus referred to as the "EDen Implementation language", EDI. EDI provides a small set of directly implemented primitive operations for basic thread control, system information, and communication. We explore the expressiveness and performance of both Eden and its low-level implementation language EDI in comparison. It turns out that hardly any differences in performance can be observed. The main advantage of EDI in comparison to Eden is more accurate control of parallel execution. Our long-term goals are maintenance and structured implementation of Eden and a solid low-level implementation language, which can be used for other parallel Haskells as well.