Highly dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers
SIGCOMM '94 Proceedings of the conference on Communications architectures, protocols and applications
A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols
MobiCom '98 Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking
PLAN: a packet language for active networks
ICFP '98 Proceedings of the third ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Functional programming
Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 2001 conference on Programming language design and implementation
EW 7 Proceedings of the 7th workshop on ACM SIGOPS European workshop: Systems support for worldwide applications
Evolution in Action: Using Active Networking to Evolve Network Support for Mobility
IWAN '02 Proceedings of the IFIP-TC6 4th International Working Conference on Active Networks
Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing
WMCSA '99 Proceedings of the Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computer Systems and Applications
A survey of active network research
IEEE Communications Magazine
The NetScript active network system
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
The SwitchWare active network architecture
IEEE Network: The Magazine of Global Internetworking
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
The early goals of Active Networking (AN) were to increase the pace of network evolution and to facilitate application specific protocols. Our aim is to demonstrate that for a specific application domain, Ad Hoc network routing, these goals have been substantially met. We argue that Ad Hoc networking is a domain that is well suited for this demonstration, due to its needs for both evolution and adaptation. We support our claim by building a series of Ad Hoc routing protocols, based on both DSR and AODV, that demonstrate heavyweight evolution, lightweight evolution, and routing adaptation. We based our design and implementation on our Mobile Active Networking Environment (MANE). MANE is a direct descendant of PLAN/PLANet and, as such, supports both Active Packets and Active Extensions as programmability mechanisms, thus giving us maximum flexibility in our demonstrations.