Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms - A Comparative Case Study
PPSN V Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature
Why Quality Assessment Of Multiobjective Optimizers Is Difficult
GECCO '02 Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: classifications, analyses, and new innovations
Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: classifications, analyses, and new innovations
Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Analyzing the State-of-the-Art
Evolutionary Computation
Epsilon-constraint with an efficient cultured differential evolution
Proceedings of the 9th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation
Alternative techniques to solve hard multi-objective optimization problems
Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
G-indicator: an m-ary quality indicator for the evaluation of non-dominated sets
MICAI'07 Proceedings of the artificial intelligence 6th Mexican international conference on Advances in artificial intelligence
A cultural algorithm applied in a bi-objective uncapacitated facility location problem
EMO'11 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization
PPSN'06 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature
Exploiting comparative studies using criteria: generating knowledge from an analyst's perspective
EMO'05 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Numerous quality assessment metrics have been developed by researchers to compare the performance of different multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. These metrics show different properties and address various aspects of solution set quality. In this paper, we propose a conceptual framework for selection of a handful of these metrics such that all desired aspects of quality are addressed with minimum or no redundancy. Indeed, we prove that such sets of metrics, referred to as 'minimal sets', must be constructed based on a one-to-one correspondence with those aspects of quality that are desirable to a decision-maker.